Jan. 29th, 2013

foxfirefey: A guy looking ridiculous by doing a fashionable posing with a mouse, slinging the cord over his shoulders. (geek)
[personal profile] foxfirefey
So, I've been doing some heavy web page optimization at my day job and on a whim I ran an analyzer on some DW pages and found what I think could be a very easy-to-make-happen optimization: we're not gzipping the JS/CSS static files when we serve them.

Examples:

* The new entry page: 221.2KiB (70% reduction) -- quite the savings when the entire bundle is 349.9 KB
* My reading page: 149.3KiB (68% reduction) -- when the total page is 541.5 K, so decent

Would this be as easy to set up as I think it would, or are there other reasons not to do it?

Profile

dw_dev: The word "develop" using the Swirly D logo.  (Default)
Dreamwidth Open Source Development

October 2025

S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122 232425
262728293031 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Oct. 31st, 2025 05:03 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios