Entry tags:
Assigned-bugs hackathon!
I checked tonight, and we've got 571 open bugs. That's a lot! 146 of them are assigned with no patch, and if we could make some inroads on that number, we'd be able to knock down the total open number a hell of a lot.
So, here's my hackathon challenge! If you've got assigned bugs, let's do whatever we can this week to get that number down. I'll start; I have 8 bugs assigned to me without a patch, and while some of them are waiting on other things to get resolved first, some of them are things I've just been putting off because I don't know exactly how to do them or was running into problems.
I've already yelled for help on what I'm stuck on, so I'll turn to y'all: what can I help you with on stuff you're stuck on? And if not me, who else can help you? A bunch of the existing assigned stuff is really complex, so let's all work together and see how much we can improve things.
Ideally, I'd like to get that "open" number down below 500 by Sunday night, and double ideally, the "all unassigned" number (currently at 386) down under 300.
*salutes you all*
So, here's my hackathon challenge! If you've got assigned bugs, let's do whatever we can this week to get that number down. I'll start; I have 8 bugs assigned to me without a patch, and while some of them are waiting on other things to get resolved first, some of them are things I've just been putting off because I don't know exactly how to do them or was running into problems.
I've already yelled for help on what I'm stuck on, so I'll turn to y'all: what can I help you with on stuff you're stuck on? And if not me, who else can help you? A bunch of the existing assigned stuff is really complex, so let's all work together and see how much we can improve things.
Ideally, I'd like to get that "open" number down below 500 by Sunday night, and double ideally, the "all unassigned" number (currently at 386) down under 300.
*salutes you all*

no subject
For 581, I need some help figuring out how to add things to the tags box when you click on a link.
And 1877 just needs me to get around to it.
Prod me next time I'm in IRC, maybe? Theoretically I could do one of those tonight.
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
I have
scalar %$tagswhich tells me the number of items in $tags, so I can construct appropriate if statements, andvalues %$tagsgets the actual values. How can I get the values of only the first 10 items? Is there syntax to say "get the nth item from this array"? The relevant line is currently:$out .= LJ::ehtml(join ', ', sort map { $_->{name} } values %$tags);which gets all the items in the array.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
I need to write Bug 153 from scratch, but
no subject
And yay for more styles and fixing caching problems.
(no subject)
no subject
My currently assigned bugs:
http://bugs.dwscoalition.org/show_bug.cgi?id=312 has patch
http://bugs.dwscoalition.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1365 is way too huge to tackle in one week
http://bugs.dwscoalition.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1574 waiting for another patch
http://bugs.dwscoalition.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1670 has patch and is the one blocking 1574
http://bugs.dwscoalition.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1685 I'll try to tackle that :) However, I have no idea how to because the preview code is confusing me.
http://bugs.dwscoalition.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1748 has a patch
http://bugs.dwscoalition.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1850 is only open because there might be new styles
http://bugs.dwscoalition.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1878 will tackle that one tonight and woule like help for making it pretty
http://bugs.dwscoalition.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1881 patch rejected, will re-upload
So I might be able to finish a few :)
no subject
no subject
For 1878, two columns was suggested as a solution. Would that work for the pretty, or did you need more detail or another idea?
Also, much yay for subscription filters that work now. Thank you!
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
Yay!!
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
no subject
- 566 is ready to either commit or close WONTFIX (since FAQng will likely make it irrelevant).
- 405 - is it still happening? (*looks at rho*)
- 86 - I need to figure out a test case that breaks the backed-out patch. (I have one that breaks the current code, but that's not the same thing.)
- 124 - I'm plugging at it piecemeal, but that will likely be a drawn-out process.
So 566 (and maybe 405) may be closable soon, but the other 2 will have to remain open for now.
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
The other unassigned bugs are far beyond my skills except #1415 so I'll assign this one to myself.
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
My skill set is limited to S2 and CSS, and I can make sense of bits of Perl (small bits!); any suggestions on what I could tackle next?
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
http://bugs.dwscoalition.org/show_bug.cgi?id=712
This is something that's been sitting for a long time because I want to work on it with Mark. It's going to require lots of effort to make everything work once the CSS files are switched around, I'm pretty sure.
http://bugs.dwscoalition.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1526
Uh...I thought this was just waiting commit, but now I see I actually should make a patch to tropo-red for it. Oops. I can do that.
http://bugs.dwscoalition.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1692
Yeah, I need to redo the patch here. I will! I just keep forgetting.
no subject
no subject
I will set myself a goal of getting at least one of them submitted this weekend. Some of the accessibility things are just too big-picture and overwhelmed me. I might just need some handholding in IRC. Maybe if
no subject
Accessibility is good. Which ones are you working on?
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
http://bugs.dwscoalition.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1743 needs a decision made on it re: stripping out all of LJ's pingback stuff.
I've also done some work on http://bugs.dwscoalition.org/show_bug.cgi?id=303 which I showed to
I think most of the new theme bugs assigned to me are waiting on commits of other patches so I don't generate patch collision.
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)