Do we want to import this change?

[pauamma]

http://community.livejournal.com/changelog/9267963.html

I'm not sure of the implications. Will the extra headers this causes perlbal to add give us better caching, worse, or indifferent?

Comments

[alierak]

Don't browsers keep small static files around by default anyway though? I thought the purpose of the ?v=1 and perlbal hack was so you could force clients to uncache static files more quickly.

[exor674]

Assuming that is right then, JUST adding v=1 to our images will do nothing to improve caching.